The Effect of Voluntary Clawback Adoption on Non-GAAP Reporting
ثبت نشده
چکیده
In this paper, we examine the effect of voluntary adoption of clawback provision on non-GAAP earnings disclosures. The extant literature documents that the voluntary adoption of clawback provisions improves financial reporting quality by increasing the costs of misstating GAAP earnings. However, managers may respond to perception of reduced discretion over GAAP reporting by increasing their reliance on non-GAAP earnings disclosures. Using propensity score matching and a difference-in-differences research design, we document that managers disclose non-GAAP earnings more frequently after clawback adoption, but the quality of non-GAAP earnings exclusions declines. These findings are consistent with a more opportunistic use of non-GAAP reporting following clawback adoption. We confirm our findings with additional cross-sectional tests related to constraints on GAAP earnings management and managerial meeting-orbeating behavior. Our results suggest that managers adapt to the more restrictive reporting environment created through clawback adoption by increasing their opportunistic use of non-GAAP reporting. To our knowledge, this is the first documented evidence of any costs associated with clawback adoptions. These findings may have implications related to the mandatory adoption of clawbacks required under the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010. JEL Classification: M41, M43, G38
منابع مشابه
Mandatory Financial Reporting and Voluntary Disclosure: Evidence from Mandatory IFRS Adoption*
Using the mandatory adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as an exogenous improvement to mandatory financial reporting, we document evidence supporting a complementary effect between mandatory and voluntary disclosures. We find that firms in countries that adopted IFRS in 2005 experience an increase in both the likelihood and frequency of management earnings forecasts r...
متن کاملIranian GAAP and IFRS: The history and current status of IAS/IFRS convergence process in Iran
This study attempts to compare and highlight the major differences between International Accounting Standards (IAS) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) with National Accounting Standards (NAS) in one of the developing nations, Iran. Over the past two decades, the Iranian accounting standards setter, Audit Organization, has decided to eliminate the differences between IFRS and...
متن کاملWhy do Clawback Provisions Affect Financial Reporting Quality? - An Analysis of Trigger Effects
We identify clawback triggers from firms’ proxy statements (Form DEF 14A) and use the likelihood of restatements to proxy for financial reporting quality. Based on a sample of 578 U.S. firms that voluntarily adopt clawback provisions during 2003-2009, when restatement-based triggers could be decomposed into two types: fraud and unintentional error, and we do observe the evidence that using frau...
متن کاملSelf-enforcing Clawback Provisions in Executive Compensation Self-enforcing Clawback Provisions in Executive Compensation *
A clawback provision is the right of a firm to recover from an executive’s compensation as the result of triggering events, such as a financial restatement. We argue that the adoption of clawback provisions may exacerbate a manager’s incentive to avoid financial restatements via earnings management. Only when the accounting verifiability is high, making earnings management very costly, can claw...
متن کاملNon-GAAP Earnings for Contracting and Financial Disclosure
We explore how the internal use of non-GAAP performance metrics in compensation contracting relates to the disclosure of non-GAAP earnings to external stakeholders. Ex ante, it is unclear why information useful in contracting would be informative for valuation purposes unless a firm’s compensation and financial disclosure processes are related. We explore this relation using a large hand-collec...
متن کامل